God Bless all who love the unshakable truth of our loving Creator.
THE GREAT TWO SEEDLINE CONTROVERSY WAR IN IDENTITY Today there is an all-out war of words
being waged in the circles of Israel Identity. Parties on both sides of the
issue have drawn a line in the sand, and ideological clenched fists are being
shaken from indignant participants. Each participant, in his own way, is trying
his best (or maybe his worst), in the most brutal manner, to draw ideological
blood. They are aiming their rhetorical cutting words for no less than the
proverbial jugular vein of their opponents in order to kill their damning
heretical influence. Both sides go to long and contentious lengths in an attempt
to prove their undying convictions on this subject. To these opposing adherents,
there is no common middle ground for compromise, nor can there ever be any. This
is a matter where one is either totally correct or totally wrong — no gray
middle areas. Many may not have a complete knowledge of this subject, but will
find themselves, eventually, on one side of the fence or the other. If one tries
to straddle the fence on this subject, he will only find himself with his pants
torn, and exposed in the most unseemly location. Like all controversies, there
is usually a right and a wrong side to consider. We will be considering who is
wrong on this greatest of all issues shortly. The concept of Two Seedline is: that
Satan once ruled to a high degree in the dimensions of Yahweh. In ages past, not
being satisfied with his high position, he tried to usurp the position of Yahweh
Himself. Satan (the shining one) convinced 1/3 of Yahweh's angels to join him in
his rebellion. This rebellion is recorded in Rev. 12:7-9 7 And there was war in heaven:
Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and
his angels, 8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more
in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old
serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceived the whole world:
he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. If you will notice very carefully, if
you have a KJV with a good center reference (cf. older World*,
Southwestern* or newer Zondervan Classic*) this verse takes you to Genesis 3:1,
4, so there is no doubt here who the serpent of Genesis is. If you don't
understand this connection with the above quoted passage and the serpent
of Genesis 3:1, 4, you will have totally lost sight of the entire story. Yahshua
the Messiah, being Yahweh incarnate, speaks of this, Satan's fall, in Luke
10:18: I beheld Satan as lightening fall
from heaven. (past tense — not something in
the future.) The concept of Two Seedlines further
predicates that when Satan fell, with the rest of his satanic beings, they left
the dimension of spirit and entered the dimension of the physical, as men. (Jude
6): And the angels which kept not their
first estate, but left their habitation
(or
principality, KJV center reference*), he hath reserved in darkness unto the
judgment of the great day. (no longer having access to Yahweh's dimension) We know these fallen angels were living
at the time of Yahshua as men, as the center reference of the KJV* takes us to
John 8:44 where Yahshua said to the "Jews": Ye are of your father the devil, and
the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and
abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. Another cross reference of the KJV* on
Jude 6 is 2 Pet. 2:4: For if Yahweh spared not the angels
that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains
(earth
bound) of darkness, to be reserved unto
judgment. That the fallen angles had the power to
change themselves into the form of men is recorded in The Lost Books of The
Bible and The Forgotten Books of Eden, "Testament of Reuben",
2:18-19, page 223: 18 For thus they (the women) allured
the Watchers (fallen angels) who were before the flood; for as these
continually beheld them, they lusted after them, and they conceived the act in
their mind; for they changed themselves into the shape of men,
and appeared to them when they were (possibly not) with their husbands. 19 And
the women lusting in their minds after their forms, gave birth to giants, for
the Watchers appeared to them as reaching even unto heaven. With this exceptionally outstanding
passage, we can more wholly comprehend what it means in Jude 6, the fallen
"angels which kept not their first estate." This passage also
serves as a paradigm or model, after the fact, of what happened previously
involving the satanic seduction of Eve in the garden of Eden. We are now more
aware of the war which resulted in the fallen angels becoming earth bound or
"chained", which is an essential element in the concept of Two
Seedline doctrine. Now that we know who the players are, let's proceed with the
narrative which resulted in the two seeds of Genesis 3:15. MENTAL AND PHYSICAL SATAN SEDUCTION OF
EVE It is simply amazing the various
unreasonable, preposterous, nonsensical and twisted arguments that opponents of
Two Seedline teaching advance to secure their groundless, unfounded and insecure
positions. I will be getting to examples of some of them shortly, after we
briefly walk carefully, step by step, through the fundamental story. It starts
with Genesis 2:16-17 where Yahweh instructs Adam before the creation of Eve. You
see, there was already a danger that Adam might mess-up by eating of the
forbidden fruit, even before Eve arrived on the scene. The important thing to
see here is, Yahweh had a very important reason for instructing Adam at this
time, for there were a lot of women unlike his kind (pre-Adamites) running
around the garden to excite his natural manly instincts. 16 And Yahweh commanded the man,
saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: 17 But of the tree
of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day
that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. The rest of chapter 2 concerns itself
with creation of Eve, an "help meet" for Adam who was genetically the
same as he was, or as Gen. 2:23 expresses it: And Adam said, This is now bone of my
bones, and flesh of my flesh: (same DNA)
she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. You will notice a good cross
reference system of the KJV* (as stated before) gives Eph. 5:30 on this verse
and says: For we are members of his (Yahshua's)
body, of his flesh and of his bones.
(same
race) To further establish the setting or
background surroundings of this story, it will be needful to consider Genesis
2:8-9: 8 And Yahweh Almighty planted a
garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 9 And
out of the ground made Yahweh Almighty to grow every tree that is pleasant to
the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the
garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
(3
kinds of trees in all) We have to look for something here that
has the knowledge of good and evil. This knowing good and evil is the earmark
of angels. Therefore, this tree that has the knowledge of good and evil must be
an angel of some rank. If Revelation 12:9 is true, he is the original organizer
of the rebellion in heaven, the old serpent himself. For proof that angels have
the knowledge of good and evil, I will quote from 2 Sam. 14:17: Then thine handmaid said, The word of
my master the king shall now be comfortable: for as an angel of Elohim,
so is my lord the king to discern good and bad: therefore Yahweh
will be with me. (check also v 20 and ch.
19:27) THEN ENTERS THE SERPENT Now that we understand that the tree
of knowledge of good and evil and the serpent are the same thing, we
are in a better position to understand who the players in this episode are,
Let's see what Gen. 3:1-3 says: 1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which Yahweh Almighty had made. And he said unto
the woman, Yea, hath Yahweh said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the
garden? 2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the
trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit off the tree which is in the midst of
the garden Yahweh Almighty hath said, Ye shall not eat of it,
neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. If you will notice the KJV center
reference* very carefully, you will find the serpent of Gen 3:1 is
the same serpent of Rev. 12:9 that organized the rebellion against
Yahweh. If you will notice again, the KJV center reference* indicates the serpent
of Gen. 3:1 is the same serpent of 2 Cor. 11:3 which reads thusly: But I fear, lest by any means, as the
serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted
from the simplicity that is in Yahshua. Right away the opponents of Two
Seedline doctrine are going to moan and groan, and say something like this, this
passage is speaking of mental seduction only. Let's see if this supposition
is true. Remember, this was the warning!: But of the fruit off the tree which
is in the midst of the garden Yahweh hath said, Ye shall not eat of
it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. EAT & TOUCH HAVE SEXUAL CONNOTATIONS What was it that Eve did eat?,
and What did Eve touch? The word "eat" in the
Hebrew is, #398, akal, to eat; also, to lay with. To prove that
many times this is so, we will use some examples from Scripture. First we will
use a supporting Scripture, Proverbs 30:20: Such is the way of an adulterous
woman; she EATETH, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done
no wickedness. Proverbs 9:17: Stolen waters are sweet, and bread [EATEN]
in secret is pleasant. Numbers 25:2 And they called the people unto the
sacrifices of their gods: and the people did EAT, and bowed down
to their gods. With this last verse of Numbers 25:2, The
Wycliffe Bible Commentary has this to say on page 145: They called the people unto the
sacrifices of their gods. The subject they is feminine,
referring to the daughters of Moab with whom the men of Israel committed
fornication. Balak, with Balaam's advice. You can plainly see, the word "eat"
(#398, akal) in Hebrew, in each of the above verses means sexual intercourse,
which it also means in Genesis 3:3 where Eve is confronted by Satan. The
scriptural passage we are scrutinizing is: Ye shall not eat of it, neither
shall ye touch it, lest ye die. Not only does the word eat
sometimes have sexual connotations, but also the word touch which is, #5060
naga, to touch; also to have sexual intercourse. We will use the
following Scriptures to support this, Genesis 26:10-11: 10 And Abimelech said, What is this
thou hast done unto us? one of the people might have LIEN (lain) WITH THY
WIFE, and thou shouldest have brought guiltiness upon us. 11 And Abimelech
charged all his people, saying, He that TOUCHETH this man or his
wife shall surely be put to death. Genesis 20:6: And Yahweh Almighty said unto him in
a dream, Yea, I know that thou didst this in the integrity of thy heart; for I
also withheld thee from sinning against me: therefore suffered I thee not to TOUCH
her. Genesis 26:28-29: 28 ...Let there be now an oath
betwixt us, even betwixt us and thee, and let us make a covenant with thee; 29
That thou do us no hurt, as we have not TOUCHED thee (Rebekah),
and as we have done unto thee nothing but good, and have sent thee away in
peace... Proverbs 6:29: So he that goeth in to his
neighbour's wife; whosoever TOUCHETH her shall not be innocent. Note: The word touch of
Genesis 3:3 is the same #5060 as the word touch, touched or toucheth
in these reference verses just quoted. Therefore, both the words eat
and touch have sexual connotations, regardless of what the
opponents of Two Seedline doctrine are touting. With these references, we
can be safe to conclude that Eve had a sexual encounter with the serpent in
the garden. Let the opponents of Two Seedline doctrine throw up their hands
in horror and consternation all they desire to. It will not change scriptural
facts. Genesis 3:13 says: ... And the woman said, The serpent beguiled
me, and I did eat. It is absurd to suggest Eve was
beguiled to eat ordinary food when Yahweh had already approved of eating from
garden-variety fruit trees (Gen. 1:29). TREES? or TREES? or TREES? The opponents of Two Seedline doctrine
are always swift to counter with the argument, If Adam and Eve could eat of
all the other trees of the garden, that would mean they could have sexual
relations with anyone whom they desired. If trees represents humans in one
place, it would have to represent humans in all other places, and this would be
highly immoral! This is entirely a false assumption because sometimes the
Hebrew is speaking of actual wooden trees, and at other times is speaking of
idiomatic trees. I will refer to the Wilson's Old Testament Word Studies,
by William Wilson, (a Hebrew reference book), page 453 under the heading
"Tree." 1
... strong, stout, mighty trees. 2 ... a tamarisk (flowering), myrica,
tamarix, orientalis, Linn. Then perhaps any large tree, and collectively, trees,
a wood, a grove. 3 ... a tree; often collectively, trees: Figuratively,
trees represent men, green trees the righteous, dry trees the wicked,
Ezek, xx. 47; xvii. 24, all the trees of the field, all men, the high tree,
lofty and powerful, the low tree, the weak and contemptible. 4 ... pl.
shady trees. For more information on "men as
trees walking", see Mark 8:24. All this demonstrates, if one wants to
make a bona fide argument, one should know what one is talking about! If this
passage meant Adam and Eve could have sexual relations with anyone in the
garden, it would have said, "all the (proverbial) beasts or trees of the
field." If one cannot separate the literal language from the idiomatic
language of the Scriptures, one simply cannot understand the Bible. In such a
case, it might be prudent not to have an opinion. George M. Lamsa, (an expert on Bible
idioms) in his Idioms In The Bible Explained, says this on the following: Garden. Gen. 2:8
—
Metaphorically — a wife; a family. Tree of life in the midst of the
garden. Gen. 2:9 —
Sex; posterity, progeny. The tree of the knowledge of good and
evil. Gen. 2:9 —
Moral law; the knowledge of good and evil. The tree of life. Gen. 2:9
—
Eternal life. The tree of good and evil. Gen. 2:17
—
Metaphorically — sexual relationship. WALKING THROUGH GENESIS 4:1, STEP BY
STEP We are now approaching one of the most
misunderstood single passages of Scripture in the entire Bible. If we approach
it too hurriedly, we will skip over it so quickly, we will never grasp its
correct meaning. There was a time when I was persuaded Genesis 3:15 was a
mistranslation, but with more research, I found it to be highly accurate. Let's
now follow the proper sequence of events. Its all a matter of putting events in
their proper order. Once these events are placed in their
proper order, all confusion with Genesis 4:1 disappears. Once we learn that
Adam's knowing Eve had nothing to do with the birth of Cain, all becomes
crystal-clear. In most cases, the logical conclusion that Cain was the son of
Adam would be a proper one, but not with this verse. The conceiving in
this verse had absolutely nothing to do with the bearing. Now let's read
this verse in a new light, but of an old truth: And Adam knew Eve his wife;
—
and (she next) bare Cain, and said, I have gotten my first (male child), a
man to present to Yahweh as first born. 2 And she again bare his (½) brother
Abel. (Gen. 12:13) I have changed the words a little to
make the meaning eminently more evident and truth worthy. Once the true order of
events of this verse is understood, it opens up a whole new understanding of
what is happening in the world today. There is very substantial evidence that
the "Jews" of today are descended from Cain. We have no less than the
words of Yahshua the Messiah Himself concerning this. Once it is understood the
"Jews" are devils walking around in shoe leather, we can begin to see
the guiding hand of the great world conspiracy and all the monstrous problems we
are faced with today. Without an understanding of Two Seedline, we are at a
detrimental loss to know who the enemy is. This knowledge, or the lack of it, is
the difference between the brightest day or the blackest night. GENESIS 3:15, KEYSTONE OF SCRIPTURE One of the very first things those
opposed to a literal Satan-spawned physical seedline do, is point out the fact
the information can be found in the Talmud. This is a sneaky deceptive method
used by many, to declare guilt by association. The question must be asked: is
every single word in the Talmud false? This idea is built on the assumption,
that if it is found in the Talmud, it is automatically evil. For anyone who uses
this approach, I would challenge them to prove every single word in the Talmud
to be false. It can't be done, even though it is a collection of the most evil
writings ever put together. Only a weak mind would accept totally such a flimsy
premise. Not only is there evidence found in the Talmud substantiating the
seduction of Eve, but evidence can be found in The Lost Books of The Bible
and The Forgotten books of Eden, "The Protevangelion" 10:1-10: 1 And when her sixth month was come,
Joseph returned from his building houses abroad, which was his trade, and
entering into the house, found the Virgin grown big: 2 Then smiting upon his
face, he said, With what face can I look up to the Lord my God? or, what shall
I say concerning this young woman? 3 For I received her a Virgin out of the
temple of the Lord my God! and have not preserved her such! 4 Who has thus
deceived me? Who has committed this evil in my house, and seducing the Virgin
from me, hath defiled her? 5 Is not the history of Adam exactly
accomplished in me? 6 For in the very instant of his glory, the
serpent came and found Eve alone, and seduced her. 7 Just after
the same manner it has happened to me. Then Joseph arising from the
ground, called her, and said, O thou who hast been so much favoured by God,
why hast thou done this? 9 Why hast thou thus debased thy soul, who wast
educated in the Holy of Holies, and received thy food from the hand of angels?
10 But she, with a flood of tears, replied, I am innocent, and have known no
man. SOME CITE THE SPIRIT & FLESH AS THE
TWO SEEDS This is one of the most ridiculous,
misdirected applications of holy writ to come from one pretending to be
inspired. It is so nonsensical, I will not affiliate the Sacred Name of Yahweh
with it. If one believes the two seeds of Genesis 3:15 are such, this is the way
the verse would have to read: And the Lord God said to
Eve’s flesh, Because thou hast done this, thy flesh is cursed above all
cattle, and above every beast of the field; and thy flesh shall go upon its
belly, and dust shalt thy flesh eat all the days of thy life: And I will put
enmity between the flesh of the woman and the spirit of the woman, and between
the offspring of her flesh and the offspring of her spirit, and the offspring
of her spirit shall bruise the head of the offspring of her flesh, and the
offspring of her flesh will bruise the heel of the offspring of her spirit. Among other very important details the
opponents of Two Seedline doctrine do not explain is: why is Cain left totally
out of the genealogy of Adam? Genesis, chapter 5, gives the genealogy from Adam
to Shem, Ham and Japheth, and Cain is not mentioned once! — Why??? Other
genealogies in the Bible go into great detail and never leaves out a son!
(especially a firstborn son). If you read Genesis 4:1 correctly, as depicted, it
is not there either — Why is Cain totally left out??? Cain’s descendants
are mentioned separately in Genesis 4:17-24 and it doesn’t list Adam as the
father of Cain!!! — WHY??? The next place we find Cain in the
Scriptures is Genesis 15:19 and we will have to read verses 18 through 21: 18 In the same day Yahweh made a
covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the
river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: 19 The Kenites,
and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, 20 And the Hittites, and the
Perizzites, and the Rephaims, 21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the
Girgashites, and the Jebusites. One of these nations among the
Canaanites was the Kenites (#7017) which were descendants of Cain.
Being that Cain was of the satanic seedline, he would infect his satanic
blood among all these ten nations. And the "Kenizzites"
were Edomites. In the Peake’s Commentary on the
Bible, page 116 we find this about this mixed
group of nations spoken of in Genesis 15:19-21: When the Israelites entered Canaan
they found there a very mixed population generally designated by
the term Amorite or Canaanite The Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the
Bible, Abridged by Ralph Earle, page 38, has
this to say: The Kenites. Here are ten nations
mentioned, though afterwards reckoned but seven; see Deut. vii. 1; Acts xiii.
19. Probably some of them which existed in Abram’s time had been blended
with others before the time of Moses, so that seven only out of the ten then
remained. The next mention of the descendants of
Cain is found in 1 Chronicles 2:55: And the families of the scribes
which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These
are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab. The Wycliff Bible Commentary,
editors: Charles F. Pfeiffer & Everett F. Harrison has this to say on page
8, and this quote will cover Genesis 3:14-15: 14. Cursed (’arûr)
art thou. The Lord singled out the originator and instigator of the
temptation for special condemnation and degradation. From that moment he must
crawl in the dust and even feed on it. He would slither his way along in
disgrace, and hatred would be directed against him from all directions. Man
would always regard him as a symbol of the degradation of the one who
slandered God (cf. Isa 65:25). He was to represent not merely the serpent
race, but the power of the evil kingdom. As long as life continued, men
would hate him and seek to destroy him. 15. I will put enmity. The word
’êbâ denotes the blood-feud that runs
deepest in the heart of man (cf. Num 35:19,20; Ezek 25:15-17; 35:5,6). Thou
shalt bruise (shûp). A prophecy of continuing struggle between the
descendants of woman and of the serpent to destroy each other. The verb shûp
is rare (cf. Job 9:17; Ps 139:11). It is the same in both clauses. When
translated crush, it seems appropriate to the reference concerning the head of
the serpent, but not quite so accurate in describing the attack of the serpent
on man’s heel. It is also rendered lie in wait for, aim at or (LXX) watch
for. The Vulgate renders it conteret, "bruise" in the first instance
and insidiaberis, "lie in wait," in the other clause. Thus, we have
in this famous passage, called the protevangelium, "first
gospel," the announcement of a prolonged struggle, perpetual
antagonism, wounds on both sides, and eventual victory for the seed of woman.
God’s promise that the head of the serpent was to be crushed pointed forward
to the coming of Messiah and guaranteed victory. This assurance fell upon the
ears of God’s earliest creatures as a blessed hope of redemption. The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia
of the Bible, volume 3, page 782: KENITES
... meaning (metalworkers, smiths). Clan or tribal name of semi-nomadic
peoples of South Palestine and Sinai. The Aramaic and Arabic etymologies of
the root gyn show that it has to do with metal and metal work (thus the Hebrew
word from this root, "lance"). This probably indicates that the
Kenites were metal workers, especially since Sinai and Wadi ‘Arabah were
rich in high-grade copper ore. W. F. Albright has pointed to the Beni Hassan
mural in Egypt (19th century B.C.) as an illustration of such a wandering
group of smiths. This mural depicts thirty-six men, women and children in
characteristic Semitic dress leading along with other animals, donkeys
laden with musical instruments, weapons and an item which Albright has
identified as a bellows. He has further noted that Lemech’s three
children (Genesis 4:19-22) were responsible for herds (Jabal), musical
instruments (Jubal), and metal work (Tubal-Cain, or Tubal, the
smith), the three occupations which seem most evident in the mural. ...
2nd quote from the same article: The early monarchy.
During this period a significant concentration of Kenites was located in the
southern Judean territory. This is clear from 1 Samuel 15:6 cited above and
also from David’s relations with them. ...
Postexilic
references. In 1 Chronicles 2:55 the families of the scribes living
at Jabaz are said to be Kenites. Apparently, during the kingdom and exile
periods, certain Kenites had given up nomadic smithing and had
taken on a more sedentary, but equally honorable profession (?) of
scribe. Peake’s Commentary on the Bible,
page 114: The etymology of the name suggest that
they were smiths or artificers, a theory which is supported by their
association with the Wadi ‘Arabah, where there were copper deposits which
had been worked by the Egyptians since the middle of the 3rd
millennium. The Jamieson, Fausset & Brown
Commentary On The Whole Bible has this to say
on Kenite, page 293: The families of the scribes
—
either
civil or ecclesiastical officers of the Kenite origin, who are here
classified with the tribe of Judah, not as being descended from it, but as
dwellers within its territory, and in a measure incorporated with its
people. The Matthew Pool’s Commentary On
The Holy Bible has this to say on the
Kenites, volume 1, page 778: The Scribes;
either civil, who were public notaries, who wrote and signed legal
instruments; or ecclesiastical ... and are here mentioned not as if
they were of the tribe of Judah, but because they dwelt among them, and
probably were allied to them by marriages, and so in a manner incorporated
with them. Which dwelt, or rather, dwelt; Hebrew, were dwellers. For the other
translation, which dwelt, may seem to insinuate that these were descendants
of Judah, which they were not; but this translation only signifies
cohabitation with them, for which cause they are here named with them. Clifton A. Emahiser' s Teaching
Ministries 1012 N. Vine Street, Fostoria, Ohio
44830 Phone (419)435-2836 Please Feel Free To Copy, Or Order: 8 ½ X 14 format. One sheet printed on each side. 10 for 2.00; 25 for 3.00; 50 for 5.00 or
8.00 per 100
St Andrew's OCC
https://CelticOrthodoxy.com