Select from
over 500 Premium Anglo-Israel Identity Books from S.T.M. (click here)
by
"Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth!"
(Galatians
4:16) Strangely enough, during the Twentieth Century, there has been a deliberate
drive, emanating from the seminaries of most churches, to attribute nationality
and specific racial characteristics to our Savior, the Son of God. Many
have tried to make Him into a Jew. (Any person with an iota of intelligence,
should be able to see where those who promote this idea, are the one's
who curse His name, and call Him a "bastard, conceived by a Jewish whore
during menstruation").
At the Council of Nicea in 350 A.D., 300 church bishops and learned
Christian teachers formed what has become known as the Nicean Creed. This
creed declares Jesus Christ to be "God of God, the very God!"
Nowhere in scripture, Old or New, can you find where an angel, a prophet
of God, a disciple, or an Apostle, ever referred to Jesus as a JEW. He
is called the "Son of God", the "Son of David", the "Son of man" and "Jesus
of Nazareth" but nowhere is He referred to as being a JEW!
In a book titled FACTS ARE FACTS, Dr. Benjamin Freedman, who was "born
again", and who had been advisor to eight Presidents, and was friends of
top Jewish leaders such as Bernard Baruch, wrote his book as a letter to
another Jew, Dr. David Goldstein, LL.D., who had converted from Judaism
and joined the Roman Catholic church.
On page 10 of this book, Dr. Freedman says: "The utterance by the Christian
clergy which confuses Christians the most is the constantly repeated utterance
that Jesus was a Jew. That also appears to be your favorite theme. This
misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact is uttered
by the Christian clergy on the slightest pretext. They utter it constancy,
almost without provocation. They appear to be 'trigger happy' to utter
it. They never miss an opportunity to do so. Informed Christians cannot
reconcile this truly unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of an
incontestable historic fact by the Christian clergy with information known
by them now which comes to them from sources believed by them to be equally
reliable.
"This poses a serious problem today for the Christian clergy. They can
extricate themselves from their present predicament now only by resorting
to 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'. That is the
only formula by which the Christian clergy can recapture the lost confidence
of Christians. As effective spiritual leaders, they cannot function without
this lost confidence. They should make this their first order of business.
"My dear Dr. Goldstein, you are a theologian of high rank and a historian
of note. Of necessity you also should agree with other outstanding authorities
as whether 'Jesus was a Jew'. These leading authorities agree today, that
there is no foundation in fact for the implications, inferences and the
innuendoes resulting from the incorrect belief that 'Jesus was a Jew'.
"Without any fear of contradiction based upon the fact the most competent
and best qualified authorities all agree today that Jesus Christ was not
a so-called, or self-styled JEW. They now confirm that during His lifetime,
He was known as a JUDEAN, by His contemporaries, and not as a JEW, and
that Jesus referred to Himself as a JUDEAN and not as a JEW.
"Contemporary theologians of Jesus time, whose competence to pass upon
this subject cannot be challenged by anyone today, also referred to Jesus
during his lifetime on earth as a JUDEAN and not a JEW.
"Inscribed upon the cross when Jesus was crucified were the Latin words
IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDEORUM. Pontius Pilate was the author of this infamous
inscription. Latin was Pilate's mother tongue. No one will question the
fact that Plate was well able to accurately express his own ideas in his
own mother tongue. The authorities competent to pass upon the correct translation
into English of this Latin title, agree that it is rendered JESUS THE NAZARENE
RULER OF THE JUDEANS. There is no disagreement upon that by any of them.
"During His lifetime here on earth, Jesus was not regarded by Pontius
Pilate nor by the Judeans among whom He dwelt as KING OF THE JEWS. The
inscription on the cross upon which Jesus was crucified has been incorrectly
translated into the English language only since the 18th century. Pontius
Pilate was being sarcastic when he ordered this inscription in Latin...
Pilate
was well aware at the time that Jesus had been denounced, defied, and denied
by the Judeans who alas, finally brought about His crucifixion as related
by history.
"Except for His few followers at the time (most of whom were Israelites
from Galilee; only the traitor Judas was a Jew), in Judea, all other Judeans
abhorred Him and detested His teachings and the things for which He stood.
That deplorable fact cannot be erased from history by time. Pontius Pilate
was himself the ruler of the Judeans when he had this inscription placed
on the cross. The ironic and sarcastic reference by Pilate to Jesus as
RULER OF THE JUDEANS, can hardly be accepted as recognition by Pilate of
Jesus as RULER, or KING OF THE JEWS. This is inconceivable by any interpretation.
"At the time of the crucifixion, Pontius Pilate was Administrator in
Judea for the Roman Empire. It was part of the Roman Empire. As far as
Pilate was concerned officially, or personally, the inhabitants of Judea
were JUDEANS not JEWS. They were not called JEWS until the 18th century.
There was no religious, national, or racial group in JUDEA known as JEWS,
nor had there been any group so identified anywhere else in the world at
this time.
"During the lifetime of Jesus, it was very apparent to Pilate that Jesus
was the last Person in Judea the JUDEANS would have selected as their ruler,
or leader.
"It is an incontestable fact that the word JEW did not come into existence
until the year 1775. Prior to this the word JEW did not exist in any language.
It was introduced into the English for the first time when Sheridan used
it in his play THE RIVALS, II,i: "She shall have a skin like a mummy, and
the heard of a Jew." Shakespeare never used the word JEW in any of his
works. In his Merchant of Venice, V.111. i.61, he wrote: "what is the reason?
I am a IEWE, hath not an IEWE eyes?"
"The best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English
are the Rheims (Douai-Roman Catholic) Edition, and the King James Authorized
Edition. The Rheims translation was first printed in English in 1582. The
word JEW did not appear in it. The King James Authorized Version was begun
in 1604 and published in 1611. The word JEW did not appear in it either."
(UNQ.)
During the 18th century, under pressure from Jewish sources, many who
had infiltrated the Christian publishing houses, the word JEW began to
appear in the English translations of the Bible.
Thousands of copies of the revised 18th century editions of both the
Rheims and King James translations were distributed to the clergy and the
people throughout the English speaking world. They did not know, and cared
less for the origin of the English word now used as JEW. They accepted
it without question. How could they know otherwise, when their religious
leaders, those who knew, refused to tell them the truth?
"If the generally accepted understanding of the word JEW and JUDEAN
were correct in the Christian world, there would be no problem. But since
the middle of the Nineteenth Century in particular, millions of dollars
have been spent in propaganda by the Jewish world leaders, trying to convince
Christians that their Lord was a Jew, and that Christianity is an offspring
of Judaism. This is where the term Judeo-Christian was coined. Along with
this, the Christian world has been oriented to the falsehood that today's
Jews are the Chosen People of the Bible, the descendants of Abraham, and
that to cross them in any way will bring about God's curse of Gen. 12:3.
God speaking to Abraham promised him: "And I will bless them that bless
thee (Abraham), and curse him that curseth thee; and in thee shall all
the nations of the earth be blessed." Religious leaders are very careful
to keep from their people the fact that this promise was made to Abraham,
not his descendants, and that there were no people named JEWS in the Bible,
until 1200 years after his death. (They first appear in 2 Kings 16:6, in
the Revised King James Version, and are fighting against Israel.)
Why is it today, that our religious leaders, especially those of the
evangelical and fundamentalist groups, can give no sensible answer to the
Jewish Question? Why do most of them constantly seek to exonerate the evilness
of Jewish leaders and make these Christ haters, therefore God haters, (John
15:23 "He that hateth Me (Jesus), hateth My Father also", into God's Chosen
People, who MUST be treated with special respect, and of course supported!
The Jewish religion of Talmudism, so different from the old Israelite
religion of Hebrewism, cannot bring salvation to anyone. The Old Testament
tells us that God gave His "oracles" (revelations) to JUDAH, and it was
said that "Judah was His sanctuary and Israel His dominion". This sanctuary
was taken away from Judah, who was under the leadership of pseudo-Jews,
the same one's mentioned by our Lord in Rev. 2:9; 3:9, in Matt. 21:43.
Jesus said to the Jewish leaders: "Therefore say I unto you. The kingdom
of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation (not the church)
bringing forth the fruits thereof." Surely the people who curse His name,
and call Him all manner of blasphemous things; who say their aim is to
destroy His church and His people, cannot possibly be the "true Israel"
of God, or His "special people."
Many of the Jewish rulers, and the Pharisees of Jesus day, had none
of Judah's or Israel's blood flowing in their veins, as is true with 90%
of the Jews today. According to John 8:33, they were related to Abraham
through Esau/Edom and you can see the outcome of this relationship in Mal.
1:2-4 - "I have loved you (Israel) saith the Lord. Yet ye say, wherein
hast Thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the Lord; yet I
loved Jacob and hated Es au, and laid his mountains and heritage waste...
Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, hut we will return and build the
desolate places; (what the Jews are attempting to do in Palestine today)
thus saith the Lord. They shall build, but I will throw down; and they
(Israel) shall call them (the Jews) the border of wickedness, and, the
people against who the Lord hath indignation forever." (In spite of what
men like Hal Lindsey and Jack Van Impe say to the contrary, watch and see
what happens to the Israeli's in Palestine!)
It is extremely important that Christians are able to "pin point" the
enemies who are making a mockery of the Christian faith today, for the
souls of millions of Christians are uneasy about the state of the Christian
faith in 1996. The minds of thousands of Christian clergy are troubled
by mysterious pressures from above, which often prevent them from exercising
sound judgment in the running of their church, or in the contents of the
message they preach.
A month seldom goes by, that I do not receive a letter from the pastor
of a denominational church, as I did recently from a young Baptist minister
in Washington State. He said: "What is this strange pressure coming from
my church headquarters, which hinders me from preaching the 'whole counsel'
of God's Word?" This pressure and those behind it MUST be identified and
stopped, if the church is to survive. If we give our people the truth,
the church will stand like the Rock of Gibraltar against all enemies who
come against her. If they are not given the truth, they will crumble and
become the Laodicean church of Rev. 3:14-22.
The Christian clergy in America are primarily, if not solely responsible
for the internal anti-Christ forces within Christianity, which today are
attacking our Christian principles. We can no longer afford to "pussy-foot"
around, because telling the truth may upset some of our people. The consequences
will be too drastic!
There is a move underway in both fundamental and evangelical Christianity,
and even within the Kingdom Movement, to downgrade the Divinity of Jesus
Christ. This is the basis for teaching that He was a Jew, whether those
who teach this are willing to admit it or not! For if Jesus was a Jew,
and is admitted as part of the Godhead, then of necessity His Father MUST
also be a Jew, and anyone with normal intelligence can see the fallacy
in this thinking.
Truly, the Jesus we worship, was much more than mortal man, although
He did take on the mantle of flesh, and become as one of us. From the fall
of Adam, to the birth of Christ, the White race, culminating in Abraham's
family, which was ultimately called Israel, waited for a promised Redeemer,
and the whole world longed for a Savior.
In the First Century A.D. the Apostle Paul tells us in Rom. 8:22 - "For
we KNOW that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together
until now." Then in vs. 23, he explains this: ...even we ourselves
(Christians) groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit,
the redemption of our body". (Which will come for the redeemed at the resurrection).
This Savior the world waited for would be the Lamb of God, slain as
it were from before the foundation of the world was laid; a Lamb without
spot or blemish, who would be offered as the Perfect, once and for all
sacrifice for the sins of His people. (See Matt. 15:24). This sacrifice
was not that of "mere" man, born of an issue between man and woman, since
all flesh had come under the corruption of sin. This Savior was to be a
"second Adam," sent by God, a perfect human being in all respects.
The writer of Hebrews (10:5) declared that God created the body of Christ
(not Christ himself, His spiritual being, but His physical body): "Wherefore
when He (Christ) cometh into the world, He saith 'sacrifice and offering
thou wouldest not, but a body, Thou (God) prepared for Me'
John 1:14 declares that this Second Adam had a perfect body created
by God: "And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld
His glory as of the only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth."
Both Adams, the First and the Second were God FORMED. The Word tells
us so and it took the perfect Second Adam, (since the first fell through
disobedience. Gen. 3:6) to redeem the world from the effects of First Adam's
sin.
Certainly the Virgin Mary was not a mother in the normal sense of the
word. There is no indication from the scriptures that she suffered the
normal, pangs of child birth or that she had a midwife to attend her. She
was the "human tabernacle" in which Christ, the Son of God was contained,
until His appearance was due. He was not conceived through the normal cohabitation
between man and woman, but through the Holy Spirit. If God had cohabited
with her, as some teach, she could rightly have been considered the wife
of God and that is Israel's position. If God had had a physical union with
Mary, He would have broken His own law, since she was betrothed to Joseph
at the time of Christ's conception, and in the eyes of the law, was as
good as married to him.
In spite of what our friends in The Roman Catholic church say, the Bible
indicates she had no other children. She was not a "perpetual virgin,"
as they teach, and she recognized herself as a sinner, she was not without
"original sin," as can be seen in her "magnificat", Luke 1:47, when she
said: "And my spirit hath rejoiced in GOD MY SAVIOR," (Emphasis mine).
It is sheer nonsense on the part of Christian leaders, when they attempt
to make Jesus into a half-man, half God being. In Jer. 31:32, Jeremiah
prophesied: ...for the Lord bath created a new thing in the earth,
a woman has compassed a man". The English word COMPASSED, comes from the
Greek CABAB, which means "to surround." So what we have in the birth of
Christ, is no ordinary conception, but a Divine act! The same Jews who
claim Jesus is one of them, state that His conception took place when his
mother Mary, a Jewish prostitute, had an affair with a Roman soldier during
menstruation.
One great Bible scholar, Dr. William L. Pettingill, writing in THE PILOT,
stated: "According to the record, what He (God) did was create (FORM) a
body for His Son and place it in the womb of a virgin, just as in the first
creation He created a body for the first Adam and placed it in the Garden
of Eden. So should it be thought incredible that God should do these things?
The real difficulty with those who reject the testimony of this Book, is
that they have a wrong concept of who God is, and what He can do."
I agree fully with Dr. Pettingill, if he would change the word CREATE
to FORM. For that is what God did with the First Adam. In Gen. 1:27 we
see where He CREATED beings, male and female, but He FORMED ADAM, male
only from the "dust of the earth", in Gen. 2:7, and did something He did
not do with His CREATION. He "breathed into Adam's nostrils the "breath
of life, and man (Adam) became a living soul." This sets him apart spiritually
from all other human beings. It does not make him SUPERIOR, but makes him
a "peculiar peoplentio1 Peter 2:9) (set aside for a special purpose).
From a biological viewpoint there can be no such thing as the "seed
of a woman", as "seed" is always provided by the man.
This is confirmed in Gal. 3:16, I believe, where the Apostle Paul writes:
"Now to Abraham and his SEED were the promises made, He saith not, And
to SEEDS, as to many (Abraham was the father of many nations, but in Israel
was his seed called), but as one, and to thy SEED, which is CHRIST."
Doesn't it seem strange to you, that the Jews who proclaim they are
the creators of the New Testament and that Christianity is the "child of
Judaism," are the one's who are openly seeking to destroy it?
The reason, I believe, is that the TALMUDIC-JUDAISTS, realize that this
section (the New Testament) of Holy Writ, plainly indicates and accuses
them for what they really are, the "spiritual children of Satan," John
8:44. Some called SEEDLINERS, believe they are the "literal children of
Satan."
If a modern preacher, or writer, such as myself, were to use the same
words Jesus used in condemning the Jews, he would be hounded out of the
country as the worst kind of "anti-Semite hate monger." They dare not do
this with Christ, as of yet. Jesus in no way softened His condemnation
of these evil people, because it might cause a political or religious "fuss."
There MUST be some definite reason why, from the very opening of the
Gospel according to Matthew, through the dosing book of Revelation, the
Lord and His Apostles, exposed the wickedness of Judaism, and especially
that of the Jewish leaders.
In John 2:13-21, we have a vivid account of how Jesus overthrew the
tables of the money changers in the Temple, and formed a whip with which
He literally drove them out, as He accused them of turning God's house
into a "den of thieves." Can you imagine the reaction today, if someone
approached a televangelist on his TV program and accused him of the same
thing? Yet they do the same thing, in their gaudy TV programs which are
designed not so much to praise God, and draw men to Him, as a tool to raise
money. Take some time and honestly evaluate a religious program such as
that put on by Paul Crouch and his Trinity Broadcasting System.
In an opening speech to a hand picked group of 47 American college students,
(43 of whom were Jews), as they attended the Lenin School of Psychological
War-fare at the University of Moscow in 1933, Nicolai Lenin told them:
"You MUST work until every teacher of psychology unknowingly or knowingly
teaches only Communist (Zionist) doctrine under the guise of psychology.
"You MUST dominate as respected men the fields of psychiatry and psychology
(note how many of these professionals are Jews). You MUST dominate the
hospitals and universities. Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution
of the country, use it's medical societies and it's laws to further our
cause. When you succeed, you will now discover you can effect your own
legislation at will and you can, by careful organization, by a constant
campaign of terror, cause the capitalist (Christian-goyim) by his own appropriations,
to finance a large portion of the quiet conquest of his country."
On page 52, of their handbook on PSYCHOPOLITICS,
which is the "blueprint" for the TALMUDIC/COMMUNIST takeover of Christian
America, they state: "You MUST recruit every agency in the nation marked for
slaughter, into a foaming hatred of the Christian religion. You MUST suborn
district attorneys and judges into an intense belief ... that Christian
practice ... is vicious, bad, insanity causing, public hated and intolerable."
This is why today, the Christian man or woman who loves God, their people,
their family and their country, enough to fight and die for them, are held
up in the Jewish owned press as a danger to the rest of the country.
In Jesus' many encounters with the Pharisees of His day, they brought
pressure against the families of those who He had healed. We have documented
evidence that the Jewish controlled American Medical Association has persecuted
Christian physicians who have practiced "preventative medicine," such as
"chelation therapy" for cancer, and other forms of natural cures which
have done much more to alleviate the suffering of cancer patients, than
the quackery of modern medicine, which sucks billions of dollars yearly
out of American pockets, while making very little headway against the disease.
There is much evidence that these men do not want a cure, as there is too
much money to be made in treating the disease, and in the drugs which are
sold. This is the moral makeup of Judaism at its best!
Whenever the teachings of our Lord came at cross purposes with Judaism,
the Jews organized against Him. This is true today, as we see an "unregistered,
illegal agency of the Israeli government, the ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF
THE JEWISH B'NAI B'RITH, as they try and remove prayer and Bible reading
from our school system, promote sexual excess among our yo speand destroy
every vestige of Christianity in the country. They have even gone so far
as to try and forbid the shipping of the Bible in the mails, labeling it
as "hate literature." These are the people you are backing in your church,
under the guise of being God's Chosen People.
While railing against the Christian New Testament, they hypocritically
promote the filth and anti-Christ teachings of their Talmud until today,
Jewish politicians are taking their oath of office with their hands on
the heathen Talmud, rather than the Christian Bible. How can we trust these
men, when under their religion, every year on the Day of Atonement, they
take the Kol Nidre Oath, which states that all "promises and oaths they
make during the coming year are to be null and void?"
Today these charlatans are attempting to destroy the Word of God, by
clever underhanded means. One of these is an organization of scholars calling
themselves the JESUS SEMINAR who are seducing Christians by impressing
them with their prestigious degrees, into believing that they are Bible
scholars, when in reality they are trying to destroy the scriptures. (Many
of them are Jews, or Christian-Zionists).
Here is part of an article which appeared in the November 8, 1993, U.S.
NEWS AND WORLD REPORT, page 75:
The Bible may be sacred, but apparently is not sacrosanct. (inviolable).
Not to members of the Jesus Seminar anyway. The controversial panel of
biblical scholars - which earlier concluded that Jesus spoke only a fraction
of words attributed to Him - has begun a radical revision of the New Testament
that it says will provide a more accurate account of Christianity's origins.
(They completely ignore that the scriptural accounts of Matthew, Mark,
Luke, John, Peter and Paul, were written in the most part by men who lived
with Jesus for three years and knew Him intimately. These are discounted
as "nobodies", JM).
In a process that may take years and is already stirring up opposition,
the seminar last week completed the first phase of a plan to redefine the
New Testament canon - the collection of ancient writings that includes
the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, 21 Apostolic letters, and the
Book of Revelation. The panel - about 70 liberal scholars who since 1985
have been examining the historicity of the Gospels - will likely recommend
that at least some of the 27 books be jettisoned (they have already recommended
this for the Gospel of John, because of Christ's many violent reactions
to the Jewish Pharisees - JM). "The Christian movement hasn't seriously
examined the question of canon since the 1 5th century," says Robert Funk,
head of the seminar's Westar Institute in Sonoma, Calif. "It's time for
academic scholars to raise the issue."
Behind the move says Funk, is the modern discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls
and a gnostic library at Mag Hammadi, Egypt, written during Christianity's
formative years. Almost certain to be added by the scholars, are such writings
as the Gospel of Thomas, a first-century collection of Jesus' sayings found
at Mag Hammadi, and the Signs Gospel, a reconstructed text of what some
scholars think is the lost account of the miracles of Jesus.
The authenticity of some New Testament books have come under renewed
attack, (this is a good word to use in this case, for this is what this
group are doing. Attacking the authenticity of God's Word. But it is interesting
to note, that this attack, from the same Judaic background, has been going
on for 20 centuries, and the Old Ship of Zion, though somewhat scarred
by the shots of the adversary, still sails gallantly along, flying from
her masthead, the flag which says: "By this sign we conquer!" JM)
To return to the U.S. News and World Report. Whatever the authority,
to redefine the Bible is to strike at the heart of sacred tradition. For
most of official Christendom, the canon has been closed since the fourth
century, when church councils approved what they viewed as the only authoritative
documents. According to church tradition virtually all of these were written
during the first century A.D., either by apostles or close associates of
Christ.
When the Jesus Seminar met in October 1992, some members rightfully
argued that altering the canon was not an appropriate task for academicians.
"We are neither qualified nor commissioned to make these kind of decisions,"
declared Stephen Patterson, professor of New Testament at the Eden Theological
Seminary in St. Louis. "What constitutes scripture is a question for communities
of faith to decide". But Funk argues that since the Bible is a "cultural
artifact", that biblical scholars have the "moral responsibility to determine
what belongs to the cultural legacies of Christianity and Judaism
"These liberal scholars have no ecclesiastical authority," says Donald
Hagner, professor of New Testament at Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena,
Calif. "They can scheme away until they are blue in the face, but they
are not going to change the church". But they have changed the church;
they are in the process of destroying it, and very few of them will admit
that this is the purpose of the Jesus Seminar, and all Judaic efforts to
destroy the authenticity of the New Testament. They are a vital part of
the New World Order scheme, which must destroy the fundamental faith of
White Christianity in particular, before they can take over ultimate control.
While these attacks go on, the Judeo-Christian church, often in silence,
cowers before these Judaic attacks, while at the same time insisting that
their founder was a Jew, and that Christianity came from the rotten roots
of Talmudic Judaism. It is indeed a strange enigma! If the National Conference
of Christians and Jews are genuinely interested in "interfaith brotherhood",
do you not think that they might start by having the Jews expunge from
the Talmud the many anti-Christian, anti-Christ passages, as they want
to remove from the New Testament, Jesus' remarks directed at the Pharisees?
The Jews of today cannot truthfully described themselves as JEWS because
they are in no sense JUDEANS. They cannot correctly identify themselves
by their religious belief. The origin of the word JEW, does not have it's
roots in JUDAISM. The words JEW and JEWISH were unknown until introduced
by Judaism in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. It took millions of dollars
to "brainwash" gullible Christians to accept these words, along with the
falsehood that Jesus was a Jew, and that Christianity came from this heathen
cesspool.
When a pastor or priest boasts to his church audience about his "Jewish
blood," (and he is a converted Jew), be also refers to Jesus as being of
"Jewish blood," His Mother Mary as being of "Jewish blood," and the early
disciples, being of "Jewish blood." What is Jewish blood? What happens
to so-called Jewish blood when a Jew is converted to Christianity? Does
it remain the same? How is Jewish blood biologically different from the
blood of other faiths and races? Especially when the Jews come from an
Ashkenazi, Turco-Mongolian background. Is their blood the same as that
of a Jew who can actually trace his blood back to Abraham? If the Jew can
do this, than why can't we Christians refer to our "Christian blood?" Even
though we come from many different races.
Why do we find female Jews, when there are none in other religions.
Have you ever heard of a female Protestant, Catholic, Hindu, or Moslem.
Yet why do our preachers refer to Christ's mother as a JEWESS?
In like manner, the popular use of the word Judeo-Christianity presents
a strange combination. When you use the term "Judeo" are you referring
to "Pharisaism," or "Talmudism?", or so-called JUDAISM? How can there be
a Judeo-Christian anything, when they are diametric opposites? It makes
as much sense as to say that something is "hot-cold;" "young-old;" "wet-dry."
These are antonyms, not synonyms as Jews would like to have Christians
believe.
According to Dr. Freedman, the word "anti-Semitism" has no place in
the English language and serves only one purpose today, that of a "smear
word". When a Jew feels that anyone opposes their objectives, they immediately
apply the term "anti-Semitic" to their victims. "When Jews in 1946, were
unable to disprove my statements regarding the situation in Palestine,
they spent millions of dollars to "smear" me as an "anti-Semite," hoping
to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were interested in what I
had to say. Until 1946, I was a "little saint" in the eyes of the Jews.
When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine,
suddenly I was "Anti-Semite Number One!"
"It is a disgrace to see Christian clergy take up the use of this word.
They should know better. They know that it is a meaningless word. They
know that the correct word would be "Judneophobe." Anti-Semitic was developed
as a smear word, because it is associated with Jesus in the minds of most
Christians today. Christians become accessories to the destruction of the
Christian faith when they tolerate and use this smear word." (UNQ)
We know that our nation's standards have sunk to a new low, in spite
of the fact that there are supposed to be 50-million "born again Christians"
in America. Where is their influence? Have they become the "salt" Jesus
mentioned in Matt. 5:13, which has lost it's "savor," it's ability to act
as salt and hold back corruption? The moral standards of a nation are the
crucible in which the nation's character is refined and molded. I cringe
when I hear some stupid person say. "The moral life of the President doesn't
matter. That's his private affair." No it's not? It's a matter of concern
for the entire nation, for we are judged by our leadership. If it is rotten
and treasonous, then our country will follow in it's footsteps! The end
product can never be better than it's ingredients!"
Those of us who have studied the conspiracy, know that the guidance
and control of this nation has fallen by default into the bands of those
persons least worthy of trusteeship. One of their greatest achievements
had been their ability to gain "in am Christian prostitutes" to front for
them. (A "male prostitute"), is a man whom offers the faculties of his
anatomy from the neck up for hire to anyone who will pay the "asking price",
just as the female of the species offers her body from the waist down.
There are thousands of these "male prostitutes" in Christianity, who walk
unnoticed pandering pernicious propaganda for profit and political power.
The corroding effect of their subtle intrigue, is slowly disintegrating
the moral fiber of this nation and threatening the very fiber of Christianity.
The scripture warns of them. In 2 Peter 2:18, be warns of those "who
speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of
the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from
them who live in error". In vs. 2 of this same chapter he says: "But there
were false prophets among the people, even as there shall be false teachers
among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the
Lord that bought them." 2 Timothy 3:1 says: "This know that perilous times
shall come," and then lists some of the perils we see prevalent in America
today.
Dr. Freedman further states: "The 150 million Christians in the United
States were high pressured' by the Christian clergy to give their unqualified
support for the Zionist program in Palestine. We sowed the wind; now we
are about to reap the whirlwind'. Christians were exhorted to regard the
self-styled Jews" of Eastern Europe as God's 'Chosen People', and Palestine
as their Promised Land. They knew better and this was a case of cupidity,
not stupidity" (UNQ).
The Christian people in America are entitled to hear the truth, and
it MUST come from their pastors. Yet, unfortunately, there are few pastors
in America today, who will tell their people the truth about Judaism and
it's conspiracy to destroy them and everything they stand for. In order
to remain free, we must preach the whole truth, not a selfish anemic message
of "personal salvation," which leaves Christ in the cold as far as His
Lordship is concerned. Our pastors lie, because the "people would have
it so." The average Christian does not want to know the truth, because
it "scares hell out of them!" Whether our Christian leaders are guilty
through ignorance, indifference, or deliberately will make little difference
in the long run, for the "Zero Hour" of the Christian faith has arrived!
No institution can survive when it is erected on a false foundation. The
deterioration, disintegration and final destruction of Christianity and
our freedom, will be accelerated in the direct ratio to the distortions
and misrepresentations we allow to creep in. We MUST allow no substitutes
for the truth. Referring once more to Dr. Freedman, be said: "For every
ounce of good you do through conversion of a self-styled Jew to Christianity,
you do a ton of harm to the Christian faith. For regardless of what anyone,
anywhere, at anytime may say, events of recent years have established beyond
the shadow of a doubt that the Christian faith today is standing with one
foot in the grave, and the other on a banana peel.
"If the day ever arrives when Christians can no longer profess Christ,
as we do in the Free World today, then we will see the beginning of the
last days. What we need today is a spiritual Paul Revere who will ride
across this land, warning Christians that our enemies are closing in on
us". (UNQ).
The End
Return to Jack
Mohr's Web Page
COL. JACK MOHR HOME
CHRISTIAN DOMINION HOME
(Exploding the false theology which states that Jesus
was a Jew,
and that the Jews are the Chosen People of the Book)
Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr AUS Ret.