The Gothic Church Legacy from Crimea to Sweden: Dynasties, Runes, and Orthodox Continuity

Celtic Church Roots, Christian Israel Nationalism, Christian Israel: Tribal & Theological, Covenantal Sovereignty, Ecclesiastical, Humanitarian Projects, Law Institute, Legitimist Philosophy, Literature, OCC Assemblies, Order Establishments, Peace Institute, Perpetual Confederation (for Christ), Priory of Salem, Protectorates, Public Representation, Royal & Noble, Sovereignty & Intl. Law, Special Reports, Templar, Theology Institute
Spread the love

The Gothic Church Legacy from Crimea to Sweden: Dynasties, Runes, and Orthodox Continuity

Introduction
Far from being extinguished with the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Church of the Goths—originating in the 4th century under Bishop Ulfilas—left behind a trail of liturgical, architectural, and dynastic legacy from the Black Sea to the Baltic. With strongholds in Crimean Gothia, Gothic-speaking Christian communities persisted into the medieval era, laying down foundations that would intertwine with both the Celtic Culdees and the Eastern Orthodox Church. This article explores the dynastic bridges, ecclesiastical continuity, and sacred artifacts that knit together this forgotten ecclesiastical superstructure.

1. Gothic Christianity in Crimea and the Ulfilas Bible

  • Bishop Ulfilas (Wulfila), consecrated c. 341 AD, translated nearly all of the Bible into the Gothic language, producing the earliest Christian Scriptures in a Germanic tongue.
  • Crimea housed the Metropolitanate of Gothia, with bishops recognized in early ecumenical councils such as Constantinople 381.
  • Archaeological sites in Crimea—including pyramid-like Christian sanctuaries—demonstrate an Egyptian-Gothic architectural influence, paralleling both Celtic and Coptic traditions.

2. Elder Futhark and the Ring of Pietroassa

  • A gold torc known as the Ring of Pietroassa, discovered in Romania, bears a partially preserved Gothic Elder Futhark inscription, dating to the 3rd–4th century.
  • The inscription refers to divine or sacrificial concepts, attesting to a literate Gothic elite that preserved both language and ritual.
  • The shared alphabet with early Sweden and Denmark underlines a north-south Gothia connection.

3. Culmination of Goths Dynasties in the House of Wolfenbüttel-Brunswick

The Orthodox and ecclesiastical independence of the Goths—present from Ulfilas to the Bishops of Crimea—was not a footnote but a sustained lineage. These dynasties formed the structural foundation of Europe’s Christian East and West, with full synodical recognition or at least cooperative engagement across the Empire.

A. Balti (Amal) Goth Dynasty (Imperial Gothia)

The Balti dynasty held the thrones of both the Ostrogoths and Visigoths, and intermarried with the Frankish and Roman nobility. The continuity extended to the princes of Septimania and Toulouse, and ultimately into the House of Brunswick:

Theodoric I → Amalric → Clodion le Chevelu + Agotta (dau. of Emperor Theodoric of Gothorum) → Brunhilda of Visigoths + Sigebert I of Franks → Chlodeswintha + Recaredo I → Bernard of Septimania → Adalbert of Alsace → Raymond IV, Prince of Gothia → Matilda Plantagenet + Henry the Lion of Brunswick → Emperor Otto IV → Emperor Frederick I of Wolfenbüttel-Brunswick → Wolfenbüttel Mini-Emperors

B. Yngling Dynasty (Kings of Scandinavian Gothia)

This early royal Scandinavian house, ruling over what was known as Gothenland, connects with the founding line of Kiev via dynastic intermarriage:

Froda (Frey) → Gotharus Ottar Vendelkråka → Erik VIII + Sigrid of Gothenland → Olaus Skötkonung → Astrid Olofsdotter + King Olaf II of Norway → Wulfhild of Gothia + Ordulf Billung of Saxony → Emperor Henry the Proud → House of Brunswick

C. Romanov-Brunswick (Kievan Rus-Gothia Line)

This crucial line cemented Gothic dynastic bloodlines with the Orthodox Christian establishment in the East:

Rurik → Igor of Kiev → Sviatoslav → Vladimir I + Rogneda of Polotsk (Gothia/Sweden) → Yaroslav the Wise + Ingegerd of Gothia → Vsevolod I → Vladimir II → Yuri Dolgorouki → Vsevolod III → Yaroslav II → Grand Princes of Kiev and Moscow → Ivan IV (the Terrible) → Ivan V + Charlotte of Wolfenbüttel → Empress Catherine Ivanovna → Ivan VI of Russia (Brunswick-Romanov) → Duke Louis of Wolfenbüttel-Brunswick (Regent of the Netherlands, Heir at Law)

D. Billunger Dynasty (Kings of the Wends and Dukes of Saxony)

A sister dynasty to Brunswick, this family held church and territorial governance from Saxony to the Wendish realms, retaining Gothia-based claims:

Wislaus III → Aribert I → Brunhart Billung → Billung von Wenden → Amelung III → Ordulf + Wulfhild of Gothia → Henry the Proud → Henry the Lion → Mechtild + King of the Wends (Mecklenburg) → Emperor Otto IV → Frederick I of Brunswick

4. The Celtic Church and the Gothic Church in Communion

  • The Council of Arles (314 AD), attended by Celtic clergy from Britain and Gaul, marked the first truly ecumenical council in Western Christendom, according to Augustine of Hippo.
  • The Second Council of Constantinople (381 AD) affirmed Gothic and Celtic independence: “The Churches that are without the Roman Empire should be governed by their ancient customs.”
  • Bishop Sidonius of France recorded the Sabbath-keeping of the Gothic Church, similar to Eastern Orthodoxy and the Culdees, writing:

“It is a fact that formerly those who dwelt in the east were accustomed as a church to sanctify the Sabbath in the same manner as the Lord’s day… the people of the west, contending for the Lord’s day, have neglected the celebration of the Sabbath, as being peculiar to the Jews… It is, therefore, possible for the Goths to have thought, as pupils of the discipline of the Greeks, that they should sanctify the Sabbath after the manner of the Greeks.”

This shared Saturday observance, like in the Celtic Gallican rite, was foundational to the autocephalous model of Orthodoxy both in East and West.

5. Ecclesiastical Independence and the Role of Noble Escort

  • The Goths and Culdees functioned as co-laborers in the evangelization and foundation of Europe’s Christian landscape.
  • Their networks were not merely missionary: they involved noble military escort and secured trade passage, which enabled the safe and autonomous movement of monks, manuscripts, and relics across Ireland, Gothia, Kiev, and Crimea.
  • These houses served as defenders of ecclesiastical independence, preserving freedom in the West to keep non-Roman traditions, such as the married clergy, local abbatial episcopacy, and vernacular Scripture.

Conclusion

The Church of the Goths was never truly extinguished. Its legacy—spanning runes, Bibles, dynasties, and churches—can be traced in the enduring influence of noble protectorates that upheld its principles from Crimea to Scandinavia and into the courts of Brunswick and Kiev. Far from isolated, this tradition was deeply entangled with the Culdee Church, sharing roots of non-Latin orthodoxy, vernacular Scripture, Saturday liturgies, and noble ecclesiastical governance.

This article is part of a series exploring the restoration of ancient orthodox jurisdictions. For related studies, visit: